Legal Opinion

Watts v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

The plaintiff is the holder of a semi-ton-tine insurance policy by which policy the defendant agreed, in consideration of a certain yearly premium, to pay to the plaintiff, at the expiration of twenty years, a certain sum of money, provided the policy had not sooner lapsed, or had been terminated by death; and also agreed at the expiration of that period that it would apportion equitably, among such of its policies of the same class as that held by plaintiff as should complete their tontine dividend periods, all surplus of profits derived from such of its policies on the semi-tontine plan a,s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Uhlman v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. St. John v. . the American Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Colombe v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Townsend v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API