Legal Opinion

Moran v. Sondalle

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 22, 2000No. Nos. 00-1190, 00-1250, 00-1206, 00-1291, 00-1220PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Per curiam

We have consolidated five cases in which prisoners required to litigate under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 instead sought writs of ha-beas corpus. The Prison Litigation Reform Act, which applies to prisoners’ civil suits, imposes requirements different from those of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which governs collateral attacks on confinement, making it important to classify cases correctly. See, e.g., Pischke v. Litscher, 178 F.3d 497 (7th Cir.1999); Valona v. United States, 138 F.3d 693 (7th Cir.1998); Moore v. Pemberton, 110 F.3d 22 (7th Cir.1997); Copus v. Edgerton, 96 F.3d 1038…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Gregory Williams v. State of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Jerry Montgomery v. Rondle Anderson, Warden, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Terrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Robert Benchoff v. Raymond ColleranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Larry Cochran v. Edward Buss, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API