Legal Opinion

Auerbach v. Barrett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

The action is based upon two claims arising out of foreign exchange transactions. No written complaint was served, and the grounds of these two causes of action are contained in the plaintiff’s bill of particulars. In each case the judgment entered restored to the plaintiff the original consideration given by the plaintiff upon the transaction, with interest. Upon neither cause of action did the plaintiff offer any testimony to fix damages.

As to the first cause of action the bill of particulars sets forth:

“ 1. That heretofore and on or about the 4th day of September, 1917, this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Safian v. Irving National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Safian v. . Irving National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Chemical National Bank v. Equitable Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API