Legal Opinion

Air Cal, Inc. v. City of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 6, 1986No. C-85-1402-CALPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LEGGE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are airlines which conduct air transportation business at the San Francisco International Airport, which airport is owned by defendant the City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiffs conduct their business under lease and use agreements entered into between plaintiffs and the City’s Airports Commission. Subsequent to the execution of those agreements, the City enacted an ordinance which in essence requires the airlines to pay a “prevailing rate of wage” to their employees and service providers.

Plaintiffs bring this action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Aeronautical Communications Equipment, Inc. v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Seattle School District No. 1 v. The State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Castaneda v. Dura-Vent Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Air Cal, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Nos. 86-2520, 86-2530Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API