Legal Opinion
Ngo v. Woodford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 21, 2008No. 03-16042PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1109Opinion by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge PREGERSON.
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
On remand from the Supreme Court, Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006), we consider whether a prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
Facts
Ngo, a prison inmate serving a life sentence, was placed in administrative segregation on October 26, 2000, for inappropriate activity with a prison church volunteer. At a December 22, 2000, hearing, the prison classification committee informed Ngo that he would be released from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Knox v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sapp v. KimbrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Nunez v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Madero Pouncil v. James TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Nunez v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.