Legal Opinion

Sapp v. Kimbrell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 2010No. 05-15745PublishedCited by 437 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

In 2002, Ivan Terrance Sapp, a California state prisoner, filed a series of administrative grievances seeking medical care for an eye condition. He never exhausted these grievances, however, because a prison official screened them out for various reasons. Sapp ultimately filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which the district court dismissed because Sapp had not exhausted his administrative remedies, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”).

In this appeal, we must decide whether a prison official’s improper screening of an inmate’s administrative appeals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Karamo B. Kaba v. E.A. Stepp, Mickal E. Laird, Dave Benson, and Joseph YonkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by437 opinions

  1. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Pavey v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. David Reyes v. Christopher SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Erineo Cano v. Nicole TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

432 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API