Legal Opinion

Sandoval Lua v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 25, 2015No. 13-95TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tax ease; effectiveness of taxpayers’ consent to assessment of taxes without notice of' deficiency; assessment within statutory limitations period; payment of tax rather than deposit of funds.

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

Plaintiffs Armando Sandoval Lua and Ya-dira Sandoval (“taxpayers”) seek a refund of income taxes paid in 2008 after an audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) of their 2003 and 2004 tax returns. Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Def.’s Mot. for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 56-1 (“Def.’s Mot.”); Pis.’ Cross-Mot. for Summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Sandoval Lua v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Wolens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Cromwell Architects Engineers Inc v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
  5. Habenicht v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API