American Sugar Refining Co. v. Delaware, L. & W. R.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United' States for the District of New Jersey; John Rellstab, Judge. Actions at law by the American Sugar Refining Company against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company and the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. Judgments for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
These cases are presented upon writs of error to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, to review judgments entered in that court, in February, 1913, in favor of the defendants in error, defendants below. They were tried together in the court below, the evidence in both cases involving the same questions of fact and law. They have been so argued here, and what we’shall have to say in regard fi> the assignments of error in the first of the cases named in the caption, will apply also to the second.
The plaintiff in error is a corporation of the state…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- F. H. Peavey & Co. v. Union Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brady v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1930
- W. A. Hover & Co. v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Merriam & Millard Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Clark v. Southern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Louisiana & P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCommerce Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.