Legal Opinion
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Merriam & Millard Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1924No. 6281PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUiNGER, District Judge.
This suit was brought to recover the difference between the tariff rate and what is alleged to have been a reasonable rate, on certain grains shipped from points in Nebraska . and South Dakota to points in Idaho, Montana, and in the three states bordering on the Pacific Ocean.
Rates on these grains of Sl1/^ cents per hundred pounds had been duly made as authorized by the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1920. Ex parte No. 74, 58 Interst. Com. Comr. R. 220. These rates had been set forth in printed tariffs filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission and published and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Montana Horse Products Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
- Brady v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1930
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Sullivan v. UNION STOCKYARDS CO. OF OMAHA, LIMITEDCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- JC Famechon Co. v. Northern Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.