Lilly Investments v. City of Rochester
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS [80] TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [77]
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Objection to the Report and Recommendation of October 17, 2014, Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (See Dkt. 80.) The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 30), as to plaintiffs’ claim for mandamus and plaintiffs’ claim for superintending control, insofar as the claim for superintending control…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.