State ex rel. the School District v. Boyd
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Nemaha county. Tried below before Stull, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Sullivan, O. J.
The only question to be decided in this case is whether certain moneys collected by the respondent as treasurer of the' city of Auburn are license moneys, within the meaning of section 5, article 8, of the constitution. The fund in controversy was raised under an ordinance whose object, as expressed in its title, was to impose “an occupation tax on certain occupations or businesses.” By. the third section of this ordinance it is made unlawful for any person, *830firm or corporation to engage in any of the occupations upon which a tax is imposed, until the tax has been first paid…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mayor of New York v. Second Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- City of St. Louis v. SternbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Denver City Railway Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Campbell v. City of AnthonySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Hunt v. Douglas Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Norris v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.