Legal Opinion

Malphurs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1996No. 96-1369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant’s conviction for battery, and his sentence. However, we strike the public defender fee imposed, because appellant was afforded neither notice of intent to seek such a fee, nor an opportunity to contest its amount. E.g., Bryant v. State, 661 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993). On remand, such a fee may again be imposed, provided that appellant is provided notice and an opportunity to contest its amount.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.

MINER, WEBSTER and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L.A.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Brantley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API