Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. Wilson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court at Memphis. ¥m. M. SMITH, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtSneed, J.

The original bill was filed by Lumpkin, to have perfected his title to a lot of ground in Memphis, bought by him from James Wilson, as attorney in fact *556of .Ruth Keene, who was the legal owmer of four-tenths thereof, as tenant in common with the other heirs of John A. Wilson, deceased.

The cross bill was filed by the children of Ruth Keene, she being dead, insisting on their title to the said lot of ground, and praying to have the deed to it made by James Wilson, as attorney in fact of their mother, declared null, as a cloud on their title.

The parties entered of record an agreement as to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dyer v. DuffyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Woodward v. JewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Whitley v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Harding v. St. Louis Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API