Briggs v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioners applied for a writ of prohibition which had for its purpose that of restraining the respondent court, acting through the respondent judge thereof from proceeding with a further hearing upon a certain contempt proceeding pending in said court, the petitioners contending that the aforesaid judge was disqualified to proceed further with the hearing of the cause by virtue of the provisions of section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1929, p. 958), and of the action of the petitioners taken thereunder presenting such disqualification and of the action of said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In re ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- County of Contra Costa v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Neal v. Hamilton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.