Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12410PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petitioners applied for a writ of prohibition which had for its purpose that of restraining the respondent court, acting through the respondent judge thereof from proceeding with a further hearing upon a certain contempt proceeding pending in said court, the petitioners contending that the aforesaid judge was disqualified to proceed further with the hearing of the cause by virtue of the provisions of section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1929, p. 958), and of the action of the petitioners taken thereunder presenting such disqualification and of the action of said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In re ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. County of Contra Costa v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State ex rel. Neal v. Hamilton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API