Legal Opinion

In re Niven

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 27, 1932No. 3046Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellant has appealed, from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner, refusing to allow claims 9 to 14, inclusive, of his application for a patent, of which claim 9 is typical and reads:

9. The combination with an internal combustion engine having a plurality of aligned cylinders, pistons operable within the respective cylinders, a single sleeve valve between each piston and associated cylinder having a combined oscillating and reciprocating movement with respect to the sleeve and cylinder axes, and a crankshaft driven by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kinloch Tel. Co. v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
  4. Carnes Artificial Limb Co. v. Dilworth Arm Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API