Legal Opinion

McNew v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 10, 1929No. A-6709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $150 and to be confined in the county jail for 60 days.

Under a search warrant issued by D. Fogelsong, a justice of the peace of the city of Enid, a search was made of the premises described in syllabus 2 of this case. The front part of the building was used as a store building in which was kept a grocery store and a drug store. In the rear of the storeroom was a kitchen, a living roon, and two…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API