Chrysler Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiff Chrysler Corporation (plaintiff) moves for an order granting summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the rules of this Court. Plaintiffs motion alleges the defendant United States (defendant), through its Customs Service (Customs), erred in failing to approve plaintiffs protests against Customs’ failure to reliquidate certain entries under the authority of section 520(c)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c)(1) (§ 520(c)). Defendant cross moves for an order: (a) severing and dismissing the first cause of action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- San Francisco Newspaper Printing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Nichimen America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988