Legal Opinion

Acosta v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to that court for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that court. A valid line of reasoning exists based on the record evidence to support the jury verdict finding defendants liable for battery and false arrest (see generally Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]). Thus, it was erroneous to set aside the verdict as a matter of law. On remittal, the Appellate Division must determine whether the jury’s verdict is in accord with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Acosta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Acosta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Francis Nemeth v. Brenntag North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API