Legal Opinion
Central Hide & Rendering Co. v. B-M-K Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 20, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 1692PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This memorandum deals with the motion of the plaintiffs for the exclusion of persons from being present at the taking of depositions noticed by the plaintiffs. The motion is made pursuant to Rule 30(b), Fed.RuIes Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C. which provides, inter alia, that an order may be made “ * * * that the examination shall be held with no one present except the parties to the action and their officers or counsel « *- *»
The motion seeks that an order be made excluding “anyone other than counsel for plaintiffs and defendant and the President of the defendant corporation”.
At…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Stortz ex rel. Stortz v. SeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jane Doe v. Taos Municipal Schools, Lillian Torrez, Robert Trujillo, and Lisa Abeyta-Valerio in their individual capacitiesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- Lowy Development Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Milt Roth Associates, Inc. v. Posner, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1971