Legal Opinion

Stortz ex rel. Stortz v. Seier

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1992No. 61644PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

A petition was filed for a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent from enforcing a protective order. That order compelled relators (plaintiffs in the underlying case) *541to “either produce [their] expert witness [for deposition] in the State of Missouri at a time convenient to the parties or [plaintiffs] shall be precluded from utilizing” the expert’s testimony. We issued our preliminary order in prohibition, which we now make permanent.

I. Background

In the underlying case, plaintiffs seek a declaration of paternity. Blood samples were taken in Cape Girardeau from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haymes v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
  2. Brown v. McIBS, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Vanderpool Feed & Supply Co. v. SloanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Williams v. Electronic Control Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
  5. Huber Baking Co. v. Frank C. Sparks Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RushingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Morphis v. Bass Pro Group, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Jane Doe v. Taos Municipal Schools, Lillian Torrez, Robert Trujillo, and Lisa Abeyta-Valerio in their individual capacitiesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  4. State ex rel. Wright v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API