Legal Opinion
Homar v. Gilbert
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 3, 1999No. 3:CV-93-852PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, Chief Judge.
On June 7, 1993, plaintiff Richard Ho-mar (Homar) filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants, all of whom are officials of East Stroudsburg University (ESU), asserting that his procedural and substantive due process rights were violated when defendants suspended him from his position as a campus security officer without pay without providing him a pre-suspension hearing after the defendants discovered that Homar had been arrested and charged with a drug felony. (Dkt. Entry 1.) He also contends that his procedural and substantive…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Nunez-Colon v. Toledo-DavilaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Williams v. Pennsylvania State Police-Bureau of Liquor Control EnforcementDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- OGONTZ FIRE COMPANY v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024