Legal Opinion

OGONTZ FIRE COMPANY v. CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00569Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OGONTZ FIRE COMPANY, et al. Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-569 CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. March 14, 2024 Plaintiffs Ogontz Fire Company and Arthur Gordon filed suit against Cheltenham Township, the Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Township, and the Cheltenham Township Fire Board, alleging constitutional violations under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and various state law violations. The claims arise from the Board of Commissioners’ decertification of Ogontz Fire Company. Defendants…

2Cases cited147 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API