Legal Opinion

Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. Kaplan

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The Stillwell Theatre, Inc., operates the Stillwell Theatre, the Windsor Circuit Corporation, the Windsor Theatre, the Rosekay Amusement Corporation, '''and the Rugby Theatre. The Stillwell and Rugby Theatres employed members of the defendant union as moving picture operators to August 31, 1930, pursuant to a contract between them. Prior to the expiration of these contracts and in the latter part of August, 1930, the owners of the Stillwell and Rugby Theatres entered into contracts with a rival union of the defendants, pursuant to which contract none but members of the rival union could be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Schlesinger v. QuintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Goldman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Esco Operating Corp. v. KaplanNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API