Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Ley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1936No. 25465PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action in equity commenced by defendants in error to quiet title to their giineral rights as royalty owners of interests in lots 9, 10, and 11, in block 4, Reno addition, city of Oklahoma, county and state of Oklahoma, upon which a producing oil well is located.

The defendants below, plaintiffs in error, in the main, owners of mineral rights in and under lots 7 and 8 of the same block, claim right to participate in the royalty produced by the well so located and producing, by virtue of community oil and gas leases and other recorded instruments covering the hd joining lots in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Merrill Engineering Co. v. Capital Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gillham v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Cockrell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Cockrell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API