Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cockrell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1957No. A-5554Published

1ConcurrenceCalvert, Justice

I do not wish to be understood as agreeing that the entirety clause in the leases involved in this case operates to permit or requires one owning only an interest in royalty derived from a part of the leased premises to share with others, proportionately, in the royalties from the entire leased premises. The parties have assumed that it does; and, accordingly, so has the court.

An entirety clause, like all other provisions of a lease contract, should be interpreted and applied according to the intention of the parties. I doubt that the parties to the instant leases intended that the entirety…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Griffin v. ChubbTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Galt v. MetscherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Thomas Gilcrease Foundation v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API