State v. Orta
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.
¶ 1. The State appeals from a trial court order granting Juan M. Orta's motion to suppress evidence of drug possession. The court ruled that Orta had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the public rest room stall where he engaged in a drug transaction with another individual and therefore Orta had standing to challenge the search.
¶ 2. We reverse the trial court's order. We conclude that an individual who occupies a public restroom stall does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy when he or she occupies it with another individual, leaves the door slightly ajar and unlatched, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LaCountWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. NeitzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. PowersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- State v. LaCountWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.