Legal Opinion

United States v. International Business Machines Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1979No. 69 Civ. 200 (DNE)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff moves the court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(1) for an order directing that Arthur G. Anderson, an employee and prospective witness of defendant, produce for inspection and copying certain documents called for in a subpoena duces tecum dated March 26, 1979, that plaintiff caused to be served on Anderson. Defendant and Anderson have made timely objection to the subpoena, and now interpose a number of arguments against enforcement of the subpoena.1 Although each *94such ground of opposition fails, three are of sufficient…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bates v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buffington v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. Barbara Buffington, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of James E. Buffington, Deceased David M. Buffington, Individually v. Baltimore County, Maryland, a Body Corporate and Politic Cornelius J. Behan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police Donald Gaigalas, Individually and in His Official Capacity Ronald L. Tucker, Individually and in His Official Capacity, and Daniel Yuska, Individually and in His Official Capacity Joseph Gribbin, Individually and in His Official Capacity L.S. Harvey, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kenneth W. Kramer, Individually and in His Official Capacity William L. Maeser, Individually and in His Official Capacity, in Re John A. Austin James G. Beach, Iii, Barbara Buffington, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of James E. Buffington, Deceased David M. Buffington, Individually v. Baltimore County, Maryland, a Body Corporate and Politic Cornelius J. Behan, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police Daniel Yuska, Individually and in His Official Capacity Joseph Gribbin, Individually and in His Official Capacity L.S. Harvey, Individually and in His Official Capacity Donald Gaigalas, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kenneth W. Kramer, Individually and in His Official Capacity Ronald L. Tucker, Individually and in His Official Capacity William L. Maeser, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Petz v. Ethan Allen, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
  5. Chevron Corp. v. SalazarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API