Legal Opinion
Druschel v. Cloeren
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 1, 2006No. 2005AP2575PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Peter Cloeren appeals a summary judgment awarding Robert Drusehel the entire outstanding balance Cloeren owed under a promissory note. Cloeren argues: (1) he is not subject to personal jurisdiction in Wisconsin; and (2) he is entitled to offset the amount of damages caused by Druschel's breaches of his employment and non-compete contracts. We conclude Cloeren is subject to personal jurisdiction in Wisconsin and he is not entitled to offsets for Druschel's alleged contractual breaches. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Cloeren is a Texas resident and majority shareholder…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- David G. Stauffacher and John P. Stauffacher v. John A. Bennett and First Heritage Savings Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rasmussen v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Asustek Computer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- FL HUNTS, LLC v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Johnson Litho Graphics of Eau Claire, Ltd. v. SarverCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- Molson Coors Beverage Company USA LLC v. Joseph Pauline and The Laundry RoomDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026