Legal Opinion

Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. v. Wiley Organics, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided November 3, 2003No. 4:01-cv-90536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PRATT, District Judge.

On May 22, 2002, Plaintiffs Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (“ISURF”), Vanderbilt University (“Vanderbilt”), and Metabolic Technologies, Inc. (“MTI”) filed an amended complaint against Wiley Organics, Inc. (“Wiley”) alleging contributory infringement of and/or inducement to infringe some or all of a number of patents held by ISURF relating to the use of the substance |3-hydroxy-|3-methylbutyric acid (“HMB”) in humans and animals in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. On July 9, 2002, Defendant Wiley filed a Third Party Complaint…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API