Smith v. Hobbs
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Greenwood District Gowrt. Judgment for defendant, Hobbs, at the January term, 1889. Plaintiff, Smith, brings the case here. The opinion states the facts. The provisions of the statutes of Iowa prescribing notice of expiration of time for redemption, that the tax deed shall be evidence, and the limitation of action, are very similar to the provisions of the Kansas statutes. Iowa Stat., 1882, §§894, 897, 902; Slyfield v. Healy, 32 Fed.
Read the full summary
Error from, Greenwood District Gowrt. Judgment for defendant, Hobbs, at the January term, 1889. Plaintiff, Smith, brings the case here. The opinion states the facts. The provisions of the statutes of Iowa prescribing notice of expiration of time for redemption, that the tax deed shall be evidence, and the limitation of action, are very similar to the provisions of the Kansas statutes. Iowa Stat., 1882, §§894, 897, 902; Slyfield v. Healy, 32 Fed. Rep. 2; White v. Smith, 68 Iowa, 313; Trulock v. Bentley, 67 id. 602; Ells-worth v. Van Ort, 67 id. 222. The statute of Minnesota is nearly identical…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
Action in ejectment, commenced March 23, 1888. The plaintiff claimed under a patent deed, which he introduced, and rested. The defendant claimed under a tax deed dated September 10, 1880. When this deed was offered in evidence, the plaintiff objected to its reception, for the reason that the deed was void, and void on its face. The objection was overruled and the deed received in evidence. Defendant rested. The plaintiff, by way of rebuttal, introduced the notice of tax sale upon which the deed was based and again rested. Judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Wasden v. FoellIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Co-Operative Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Rowsey v. JamesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gibson v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911