Legal Opinion

Isbell v. Bay Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1921No. Calendar No. 29,525PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Mandamus by Citarles L. Isbell to' compel Samuel G. Houghton, circuit judge of Bay county, to vacate an order denying a motion for the return of money deposited in lieu of bail.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

Plaintiff’s son, Charles S. Isbell, was arrested, proceeded against before a committing magistrate and by him held for trial at the next ensuing term of the Bay county circuit court on a charge of unlawfully having intoxicating liquor in his posses*365sion. Bail for his appearance at the time and place specified by the court was fixed by the magistrate at the sum of $500, in default of which he was remanded to the county jail to await trial or until released on bail. Counsel who had charge of his case consulted with plaintiff in regard to securing bail for his son, resulting in plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Gilbert v. . LaidlawNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Heine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. State v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Gustafson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API