Arenjay Corporation, A. James Sedwick, Jr., Tax Matters Person v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Declining the importunity of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that we interpret a statute clear on its face to convey a different meaning because in the Commissioner’s opinion, unsupported by record evidence, the patent reading would lead to absurd consequences, we hold that the procedural provisions of subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code relating to partnerships apply to subchapter S corporations, and reverse the contrary Tax Court judgment.
In 1982, Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code to provide for unified treatment of subchapter S items among…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dresser Industries, Inc. And Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Blanco Inv. & Land, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert Fehlhaber v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Twenty-Three Nineteen Creekside, Inc. Michael E. Baldigo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Charles D. Beard, Jr. Mary Sue Beard v. United States of America, John G. Beard Louise H. Beard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Eastern States Casualty Agency, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
- Home of Faith v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.