Legal Opinion

Activate, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 16, 2009No. 37329-7-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.

¶1 Activate, Inc., filed a refund claim under RCW 82.32.1801 after paying an assessment of $131,794.29 to the Department of Revenue (DOR) for unpaid use tax on a portion of its cellular telephone inventory. Both DOR and Activate moved for summary judgment, and the trial court ruled in DOR’s favor. Activate now appeals, arguing that *810the trial court erred by (1) granting DOR’s motion and denying its own motion for summary judgment, (2) ruling that it did not qualify for the resale exemption under RCW 82.04.050(l)(a), and (3) failing to rule that it qualified for the competitive telephone…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. Sprint Spectrum, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Cashmere Valley Bank v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Green Collar Club v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Assurance Wireless USA, LP v. Dep't of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Cashmere Valley Bank v. Dept. Of Revenue, State Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API