Legal Opinion
Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 2, 2000No. 96-6652, 00-5367PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MERRITT, Circuit Judge,
joined by MARTIN, Chief Judge, and MOORE, DAUGHTREY, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
The October 30, 1998, panel decision, as amended, affirming the District Court’s denial of the petition for habeas corpus remains in effect. As a result of an equally divided Court, the en banc Court rejects the petitioner’s motion to reopen. Seven judges have voted to reverse and remand the case for further proceedings for the reasons stated in' an opinion written by Judge Merritt and attached hereto. Seven judges have voted against a remand for further proceedings in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Workman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- John Demjanjuk v. Joseph PetrovskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Larry Pat Souter v. Kurt Jones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Philip Workman v. Governor Phil BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Douglas v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Holloway v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.