Legal Opinion
Bartosh v. Board of Osteophatic Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1947No. Civ. No. 15926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for decision is whether the Board of Osteopathic Examiners is required to use the services of a hearing officer at the trial of a physician accused of unprofessional conduct.
On September 16, 1946, petitioner was accused of unprofessional conduct, to wit, a violation of section 2377 of the Business and Professions Code which declares it to be unprofessional conduct for a physician in any way to aid or abet the procuring of a criminal abortion.* With a copy of the accusation petitioner received a notice that a hearing thereon would be had before the Board of Osteopathic Examiners…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Culver v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Knapp v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Savage v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cnty. of San Diego v. Comm'n on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Board of Osteopathic Examiners v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Moyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956