Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1924No. 7 Div. 508PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The complaint in this case counts upon a breach of the defendant carrier’s contractual undertaking to carry the plaintiff from Boaz to Littleton. The allegation of breach is that defendant failed to stop its train, on which plaintiff traveled, at Littleton, the point of her destination, and carried her on by and beyond the station. The complaint shows that the train returned to the station, and there discharged the plaintiff.

While there might be circumstances which would justify the failure of a passenger train to stop at a point to which it has undertaken to carry and discharge passengers —…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SeabornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. KrichbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Birmingham Water Works Co. v. MartiniAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. QuickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Sanford v. Western Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Zeigler v. Blount Bros. Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API