Legal Opinion
Horelick v. PENNA. R. CO.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
24 N.J. Super. 413 (1953)
94 A.2d 685
CELIA HORELICK AND DAVID HORELICK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 12, 1953.
Decided February 5, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.
Mr. Archie Elkins argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents.
Mr. William E. Bardusch, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. O'Mara, Schumann, Davis & Lynch, attorneys; Mr. Gerald F. O'Mara, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
The question raised…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. TrautweinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
- Galloway v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bright v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Bradley v. Erie R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kantonides v. KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992