Legal Opinion
Kantonides v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-3145 (AJL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiffs Theodora Kantonides (“T. Kantonides”) and her husband Andreas Kantonides (“A. Kanto-nides”) (collectively, the “Kantonides”) against defendant KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”). Jurisdiction appears to be appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Currently before the court is the motion of KLM for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on the complaint (the “Complaint”), filed 19 July 1991. 1 For the reasons set forth below, summary judgment is granted.
Facts
For the purposes of this motion, KLM does not…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Holmes v. Kimco Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Riggs v. SchappellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Kalantar v. Lufthansa German AirlinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Beaudet v. British Airways, PLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Abu Hamdeh v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.