Legal Opinion
Hughes v. WMCA, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 1, 1965No. 623PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
The motions to affirm are granted and. the judgments are affirmed.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Goldberg join the affirmance in No. 623 since it is their understanding that it in no way interferes with the power of the District Court, in the light of circumstances as they may develop, to vacate or .otherwise modify its order requiring an election in the fall of 1965.
2Cited by36 opinions
- Connor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Sims v. AmosDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972
- Butcher v. BloomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Donohue v. Board of Elections of State of NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.