Hurley v. Powell, Levy & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Taylor District Oourt. Action of right for the possession of the N. E. J S. W. J section thirty-one, township sixty-eight, range thirty-four. Answer, denial of plaintiff’s title, and a claim of title in defendants under a treasurer’s deed. Trial by the court on an agreed statement of facts; judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
l. tax sale: Susiveness11" °f deed. — I. The fact mainly relied on, as a defect in the defendant’s title, is, that the tax warrant required by law to be attached to the tax duplicate, for some of the years for the delinquencies of which the sale was made, was not attached, and for others bore the seal of the district court; and that for none of the years is there any record of an order of *65the board of supervisors directing the attachment of such warrant. This cause was decided in the court below, by the writer hereof, without an examination of the question as an original one, following what…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Eldridge v. KuehlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Allen v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Parker v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Corbin v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grant v. BartholomewNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Crisman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Corning Town Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Litchfield v. County of HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Tyler v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.