Legal Opinion
National Advertising Company v. The City Of Ashland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1982No. 81-3076PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
678 F.2d 106
NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, a subsidiary of Minnesota
Mining & Manufacturing Company, a Delaware
corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The CITY OF ASHLAND, OREGON, a Municipal corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 81-3076.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 5, 1982.
Decided May 26, 1982.
Alfred A. Hampson, Hampson & Bayless, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.
Ben Lombard, Jr., Ashland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.
Before KENNEDY, FARRIS, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
KENNEDY,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parks v. Donrey, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984
- Lamar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. City of Rapid CityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015