Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Interest of C. L.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 29, 2007No. A06A2490Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

Because I disagree with the majority’s interpretation of OCGA § 19-7-1 (b.l) as not providing a means by which the original legal father may seek custody, I respectfully dissent.

This Code section provides:

Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of this Code section or any other law to the contrary, in any action involving the custody of a child between the parents or either parent and a third party limited to grandparent, great-grandparent, aunt, uncle, great aunt, great uncle, sibling, or adoptive parent, parental power may be lost by the parent, parents, or any other person if the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Veal v. VealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API