Legal Opinion

Veal v. Veal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 2006No. S06F1460PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

Ms. Veal (“wife”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting full custody of her biological daughter H. to Mr. Veal (“husband”). Because husband is neither the biological nor the legal father of the child, we find that the trial court erred by awarding husband custody of H. Therefore, we reverse.

H. was born April 10, 1997. Husband was present at H.’s birth and his name was put on her birth certificate, though both parties knew that he was not the child’s father. Husband and wife were married on May 31, 1997, and had three other children during their marriage.

Husband…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. In Re PickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of C. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Baskin v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. In the Interest of C. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Susan Hill v. Amy BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API