Legal Opinion

Cogburn v. Callier

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1925No. 4 Div. 146PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The bill of complaint shows that Lou A. Cogburn, widow of John A. Cogburn, duly dissented from his will. The effect of this dissent was the same as intestacy, so far as she was concerned (section 10593, Code 1923), and, there, being no children, she was entitled to take all the personal property of the decedent (section 7374, Code 1923). It appears, therefore, on the face of the bill, that the respondents, as heirs at law of the widow, and not these complainants, are the owners of the personal property that belonged to the estate of the decedent, John A. Cogburn, regardless of any exemption…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. McClurkin v. McClurkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Cochran v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Singo v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Terrell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Frank v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1943
  5. Crowson v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API