Legal Opinion

United States v. Becerra-Sandoval

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2001No. 00-50167; D.C. No. CR-99-01089-LGB-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm the conviction and sentence entered by the district court. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here.

Assuming the district court erred during the plea colloquy by fading to inform Becerra-Sandoval of the “found in” element of the charged offense, the error was harmless as Becerra-Sandoval had previously indicated his awareness of that element. Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(h).

The requirement that BecerraSandoval report to a probation officer upon reentry to the United States does not violate the Fifth Amendment. The privilege against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacheco-Zepeda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Esquibel v. MinserDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  3. Pacheco-Zepeda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API