Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Meinsen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 25, 2000No. 99 Civ. 3958(SAS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Angel Santiago brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants Deputy Superintendent William Meinsen, Captain John Maly, Lieutenant Glass, Sergeant James Whitney and Sergeant B. Rivera were deliberately indifferent to his safety needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 1 Defendants are all employees of the Downstate Correctional Facility (“Downstate”) in Fishkill, New York, where plaintiff contends the alleged constitutional violation occurred.
Defendants now move, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Napier v. Laurel CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- McCoy v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Neal v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Sonds v. St. Barnabas Hospital Correctional Health ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Medina-Claudio v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.