Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rudden

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 24, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

The compromise and settlement of a contested probate proceeding has resulted in the present proceeding under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act, whereby the attorneys-for the former contestant seek to charge *689the estate for services rendered by them which allegedly benefited the estate.

The petitioners allege that a substantial portion of the services performed by them related to efforts on their part to arrive at a compromise and settlement of the contested probate, and that “ all effort toward settlement materially benefited the estate and therefore should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of ForemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sussman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of BacharachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API