McBirney v. Board of Equalization of Tulsa County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, V. C. J.
It is contended by appellant that.the taxable valuation placed upon the property involved by the county board of equalization is unjust and not equal to assessments upon adjoining and abutting properties, and that the valuation so fixed is contrary to the evidence.
The approximately 00 acres of land involved adjoins the city limits of Tulsa, and is platted into some 220 to 225 lots. The same was assessed as of January 1, 1937, by the owner at $9,000, and raised by the assessor to $19,200. Upon complaint being filed with the board of equalization, hearing was had and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- St. Louis Electric Bridge Co. v. KoelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Appeal of National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- In Re Assessment of National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Board of Equalization of Tulsa County v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941