Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Hutto
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Under the insurance contract involved in this case, liability coverage is afforded to two classes of automobiles—“owned” automobiles and “non-owned” automobiles, both of which terms are explicitly defined in the “Definitions” section applicable to the liability coverage. The question in this case is whether the pickup truck is covered as a “non-owned automobile.”
The policy provides in the “Definitions” section: “ ‘non-owned automobile’ means a private passenger automobile or trailer. . . ‘Private passenger automobile’ means a four-wheel private passenger, station wagon or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malsby & Avery v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Maddox v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Fisher v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. HulseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance v. Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Joanna Garmany, by and Through Her Next Friends v. Mission Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. TylerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Erquitt v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.