Legal Opinion

Confederated Bands of Ute Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 13, 1950No. Nos. 45585, 46640, 47564, 47566PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Reporter’s statement of the case:

In an opinion in Case No. 45585 (100 C. Cls. 413, 420) the Court of Claims decided that under the terms of tlie Jurisdictional Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1209), plaintiffs in that case were entitled to recover just compensation for all lands in Colorado north of and including township 35 north, held by the United States for disposal under Section 3 of the Act of June 15, 1880, at the time of approval of the 1938 Act, subject, however, to the deduction of offsets, if any, and reserving the determination of the amount of the recovery and the amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ute Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910
  2. Confederated Bands of Ute Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Confederated Bands v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hackford v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hackford v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. The United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of IndiansUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API